UPDATE: AS OF 2/10/25 SB 84 THE DEMOCRAT AMY KLOBUCHAR AND DICK DURBIN (Federal BILL) Came to the floor. SENATORS JOE NICOLA AND MIKE MOON WERE THE ONLY TWO SENATORS TO STAND AND QUESTION THIS BILL. THEY BOTH DID AN AMAZING JOB.
SENATOR JAMIE BURGER COULD NOT ANSWER THE MOST BASIC QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS OWN BILL. AFTER MAKING IT ABUNDANTLY CLEAR HE DID NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT THIS BILL SAID WHEN ASKED SPECIFIC QUSETIONS BY SENATOR MOON, SENATOR BURGER LAID THE BILL OVER.
WHAT WILL TOMORROW BRING? WE SHALL SEE AND REPORT BACK HERE SO YOU CAN HOLD YOUR SENATOR ACCOUNTABLE. STAY TUNED.
Grassroots Army We NEED You!!!!
If you do not want any of this bad legislation to pass then you need to make it known to our conservative Senators that you want them to stand to filibuster any of these bills that you are opposed to. Make sure you emphasize a no vote is not enough. You want them to filibuster or amend the bill. TO VOTE NO AND ALLOW THESE THINGS TO PASS THE SENATE IS SHAMEFUL. THEY MUST STAND FOR THEIR CONSTITUENTS.
Our “Conservatives” are:
Senator Rick Brattin 573-751-2108
Senator Ben Brown 573-751-3678
Senator Jill Carter 573-751-2173
Senator David Gregory 573-751-5568
Senator Brad Hudson 573-751-1882
Senator Mike Moon 573-751-1480
Senator Joe Nicola 573-751-3074
Senator Adam Schnelting 573-751-1141
Senator Nick Schroer 573-751-1282
Bills that could come to the floor for perfection any day-
SB 4, 5 & 6 Cierpiot
These are allowing utilities gas and water utilities to bill us up front for construction of new plants and projects as a fixed cost in our bills. We only pay for these things now when they are completed in use. The estimates of increase to our bills are enormous. Tell them to filibuster this bill and quit entertaining bills that are going to raise our utility costs. Why are we paying for the utility companies and their infrastructure for new projects that are showing profits in the tens of millions every year ? NO MORE ELECTRIC BILL INCREASES. THESE ARE ALL VERY BAD BILLS THAT CREATE A MASSIVE OMNIBUS BILL.
SB 52 Schroer & SB 44 Fitzwater
Overall this is a good protection bill but it needs a few changes. It is raising the crime of endangerment of a child that could be weaponized against good parents. The definition states “anything that endangers the health, safety or welfare of the child”. This could be medical decision, vaccination or mental health by not affirming a gender identity, or the requirement of a child to attend church weekly with their families. This could be considered by therapist, psychiatrists, or attorneys as posing a risk to the “HEALTH” (think mental health) of a child. THIS PORTION IS VERY DANGEROUS TO PARENTAL RIGHTS. IT MUST BE STRIPPED OUT OF ANY PUBLIC SAFETY BILLS.
This bill also establishes the thought police by giving them the authority to ask for name, address and other details because they think you MIGHT cause a crime.
Please let them know this bill must be changed before passage.
SB84 Burger
Makes it a crime to even alarm an election worker. This bill was Democrat Klobuchar’s bill at
the federal level to silence any checking into election fraud.
Make it known that you want them to filibuster and kill this bill.
SB14 Justin Brown
Bayer pesticide label changing requirements that would enable them to not get sued and win by anyone harmed by their products. This is because they are using this on our food supply and farmers among others are bringing suits for damages.
Let them know they need to kill this bill.
SB29 Bean & SB82 Burger
They are trying to create a legal path to export our water by permit, but they say they don’t want to export the water. THAT IS NOT TRUE. Right now we have perfect water rights, also called riparian rights. Water cannot be exported out of our state now. If they do that is considered an infringement of our riparian rights. If anyone were to do that, we have standing to sue. The bad actors pushing this bill want to give DNR the ability to issue permits to their buddies to legally pick who exports. If passed our water bills will be sure to increase and most likely be rationed.
Tell them you expect them to filibuster to kill this bill.
SB 84: REPUBLICAN SENATOR JAMIE BURGER/ELECTIONS
COPY OF RADICAL DEMOCRAT SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND SENATOR DICK DURBIN’S ELECTION BILL AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL (SEE BELOW)
TAKE A LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE OF SENATOR BURGER’S BILL:
ENGAGES IN “REASONABLY CALCULATED” CONDUCT THAT “ALARMS” AN ELECTION OFFICIAL OR THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS. WHO ARE “ELECTION OFFICIALS”? What does “reasonably calculated” mean? Who decides? What does “alarm” mean? Who decides? Those are the main focuses and the danger zone in this bill. This is intended to strip you of your First Amendment right to redress your elected officials. THINK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED IN THE BIG CITIES LIKE DETROIT, ATLANTA, PHILADELPHIA, MARICOPA COUNTY AMONG SO MANY OTHERS CITIES AND COUNTIES IN OUR COUNTRY WHEN YOU THINK THE ELECTION OF 2020.
DECEPTION…WHO DEFINES?
INDUCE, INFLUENCE, OR PRESSURE? WHO DEFINES WHAT THOSE THINGS MEAN OR WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE?
CONDUCT REASONABLY CALCULATED TO HARASS OR ALARM? WHO DEFINES WHAT “TO ALARM” MEANS?
WHO IS INCLUDED IN THIS LAW? ALL OF THESE INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR FAMILIES.
UNDERSTANDING THAT ST. LOUIS AND KANSAS CITY HAVE THEIR OWN ELECTION BOARDS THAT DO NOT (SUPPOSEDLY) FALL UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IN MISSOURI, BUT THIS LAW WILL APPLY TO THEM, AS WELL. MEANING: NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO QUESTION THEIR ACTIONS OR THE ACTIONS OF THEIR FAMILIES OR ELSE THEY MAY BE “ALARMED” . NO ONE DARE POINT OUT THE FACT LARGE TRUCKS ARE COMING IN AND OUT OF THEIR JURISDICTIONS WITH VIDEO PROOF ON SOCIAL MEDIA OR ELSE BECAUSE THIS MAY MEAN THE ELECTION OFFICIALS (LOOK AT ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS THIS INCLUDES) FEEL “PRESSURED”.
REMEMBER: THE THINGS SUCH AS STALKING, BODILY INJURY, HARASSMENT, OR THREATS OF HARM AGAINST THE ELECTION OFFICAL OR THEIR FAMILIES IS ALREADY A CRIME. THERE DOES NOT NEED TO BE A REDUNDANT LAW. THIS IS NOT ABOUT THOSE THINGS. THIS IS ABOUT THE FINE PRINT AND AMBIGUOUS WORDING TO STRIP US FROM OUR RIGHTS TO REDRESS QUESTIONABLE BEHAVIOR INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT…NOTABLY THE ELECTIONS IN OUR COUNTRY.
YOU ARE TRACKING, RIGHT?
NOT TO MENTION THIS BILL WAS FILED IN RESPONSE TO THE PROTESTS WITH RESPECT TO THE RESPONSE TO THE 2020 ELECTIONS BY RADICAL LEFTIST SENATORS AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. THEY DID NOT WANT CITIZENS TO BE ABLE TO VOICE CONCERNS OR TO REDRESS THEIR GOVERNMENT. SEE BELOW.
SENATOR SCHROER AND SENATOR FITZWATER SB 52 & SB 44: PUBLIC SAFETY BILL
MOST OF THE BILL IS GOOD. THE PART THAT GIVES US GRAVE CONCERN IS HERE:
SEE how they snuck in that portion “ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD IN THE FIRST DEGREE” and then added a comma. It is confusing when you do not understand what they are trying to do here.
THIS PUBLIC SAFETY BILL IS ADDING ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD TO THIS PORTION OF LAW CONSIDERED A “DANGEROUS FELONY”.
CURRENTLY THESE ARE CONSIDERED “DANGEROUS FELONIES” IN MO:
THIS BILL SPONSORED BY SCHROER AND FITZWATER WILL ADD “ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD TO THIS DEFINITION BY WAY OF THIS BILL”.
WHAT DOES “ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD” MEAN?
THIS MEANS THE RISK OF “MENTAL HEALTH” OF A CHILD AS DEFINED BY WHOM? PARENTS CAN BE CONSIDERED THE NUMBER ONE PERPETRATOR OF A RISK OF A CHILD”S MENTAL HEALTH IN THE DAY AND AGE WE LIVE IN NOW. THINK ABOUT A CHILD WHO IS ENCOURAGED TO TRANSITION IN SCHOOL, BUT AT HOME HIS PARENTS ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE. AS A RESULT THOSE PARENTS CAN BE CONSIDERED A MENTAL HEALTH RISK TO THAT CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 17 AND BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME DUE TO THE FACT THEY ENDANGER THE MENTAL HEALTH OF THAT CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 17.
SHOULD YOU WORRY THAT DESE IS OVERSEEING CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH IN MISSOURI? YES, YOU SHOULD. ABSOLUTELY.
THEY ARE DEFINING “MENTAL HEALTH” BASED ON ONLINE SURVEYS AND TESTING OUT OF THE PER VIEW OF THE TEACHERS AND PARENTS. KIDS ARE BEING SIGNALED AS A RISK DUE TO THEIR UNKNOWN ANSWERS VIA TECHNOLOGY.
TO RAPE, SEXUALLY ASSAULT, SEXUALLY ABUSE, GIVE DRUGS, ETC. ETC. IS ALREADY CONSIDERED A DANGEROUS FELONY.
WITH THESE BILLS THEY ARE ADDING THE “ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD” which includes KNOWINGLY ACTS IN A WAY TO “ENDANGER THE HEALTH OF A CHILD”. IN THE DAY AND AGE WE LIVE IN, DESE CAN DECIDE BY WAY OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND PSYCHIATRISTS INSIDE OF OUR SCHOOLS VIA TELE HEALTH ADOPTING THE DEFINITIONS OF THE WHO, NIH, UNITED NATIONS OR THE CDC AS THEIR GUIDING TOOL AS THEY HAVE IN THE PAST will make parents guilty of a “DANGEROUS FELONY” is they try to attempt to push their values on a child that causes them anguish or becomes toxic to their “health” which mental health is included.
MOST OF THE BILL IS GOOD, BUT THIS HAS TO BE CHANGED. THIS IS A TRUE THREAT TO PARENTAL RIGHTS.
JUSTING BROWN BAYER/MONSANTO/BILL GATES BILL SB 14
DANGEROUS TO ORDINARY CITIZENS OF MISSOURI:
THEY WANT TO REMOVE WARNING LABELS NOW OR IN THE FUTURE DESPITE THE MAJOR LAWSUITS THAT ARE BEING SETTLED RIGHT NOW ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
KEHOE PUSHING FOR THE PASSAGE OF THIS BILL. BLUNTS LOBBYING FIRM HUSCH BLACKWELL LOBBIES FOR BAYER/MONSANTO
THIS IS A FIGHT IN OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW, NOT JUST MISSOURI:
IF YOU ARE NOT CONNECTED TO IHC IN MISSOURI YOU NEED TO BE. THEY ADD INCREDIBLE ALERTS AND KEEP US INFORMED ABOUT THINGS THAT MATTER TO US ALL. WE FULLY ENDORSE AND TRUST THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION ALERTS.
Share this post