Why do the Missouri House Republicans overwhelmingly support the United Nations and their Agenda 2030 by passing legislation that advances the UN policies that promise to enslave Missourians?
If you do not understand the bill, you should not be spreading misinformation about it. Green bonds are already being issued in Missouri. This bill would greatly restrict the issuance of Green Bonds in Missouri and cost groups like Blackrock a lot of money because it would greatly reduce the supply of the Green Bonds they so desperately need to feed their lies. C'mon, ladies! Get your facts straight!
I understand the bill perfectly and am very familiar with Agenda 2030, are you? Climate Change and Climate Science is not something any Republican should be pushing due to the fact this is a United Nations agenda. You need to do your research. IF...IF the goal of the bill is to restrict the issuance of Green Bonds the bill needs to say that in real English. That is not what is says.
I have read that Los Angeles is slated to become a "15 Minute City". (I believe by 2030 if I remember correctly.) It makes you wonder about the timing of the fires and the actions of the local government officials.
I just looked up Green Bonds on the World Economic Forum's website. The WEF promotes Green Bonds . Keep in mind that these are the same people who promote taxing cow farts, want us to eat bugs and have no borders. They also have stated that people (us, not them) "Will own nothing and be happy". This is what they state "Global green initiatives such as the Paris Agreement on climate change and the UN Sustainable Development Goals have helped spur this expansion and "Issuing green bonds offers several advantages to organizations. Firstly, it enhances the issuer's reputation by demonstrating a commitment to environmental sustainability, which can improve public perception and stakeholder relations." and "Climate bonds, sometimes used interchangeably with green bonds, are more specifically focused on projects that reduce carbon emissions or mitigate climate change effects." Reducing carbon emissions? We all know what THAT means. And "environmental sustainability" that translates to they want us eating bugs, living in 15 minute cities and not having any children. NO THANK YOU. I DO NOT CONSENT.
If you do not understand the bill, you should not be spreading misinformation about it. Green bonds are already being issued in Missouri. This bill would greatly restrict the issuance of Green Bonds in Missouri and cost groups like Blackrock a lot of money because it would greatly reduce the supply of the Green Bonds they so desperately need to feed their lies. C'mon, ladies! Get your facts straight!
I understand the bill perfectly and am very familiar with Agenda 2030, are you? Climate Change and Climate Science is not something any Republican should be pushing due to the fact this is a United Nations agenda. You need to do your research. IF...IF the goal of the bill is to restrict the issuance of Green Bonds the bill needs to say that in real English. That is not what is says.
I have read that Los Angeles is slated to become a "15 Minute City". (I believe by 2030 if I remember correctly.) It makes you wonder about the timing of the fires and the actions of the local government officials.
I just looked up Green Bonds on the World Economic Forum's website. The WEF promotes Green Bonds . Keep in mind that these are the same people who promote taxing cow farts, want us to eat bugs and have no borders. They also have stated that people (us, not them) "Will own nothing and be happy". This is what they state "Global green initiatives such as the Paris Agreement on climate change and the UN Sustainable Development Goals have helped spur this expansion and "Issuing green bonds offers several advantages to organizations. Firstly, it enhances the issuer's reputation by demonstrating a commitment to environmental sustainability, which can improve public perception and stakeholder relations." and "Climate bonds, sometimes used interchangeably with green bonds, are more specifically focused on projects that reduce carbon emissions or mitigate climate change effects." Reducing carbon emissions? We all know what THAT means. And "environmental sustainability" that translates to they want us eating bugs, living in 15 minute cities and not having any children. NO THANK YOU. I DO NOT CONSENT.
Thank you for doing the research. We are with you.