2 Comments

On another note:

Biden sent an envoy to California to study what the state has done with its radical climate bills in order to put the ideas to work in the $1.2 trillion dollar Infrastructure Bill and the $720 billion dollar Inflation Reduction Act. In order to “incentivize” states, the federal government offers grants for voluntary, nonbinding, United Nations SDGs. In other words, states don’t have to do this; however, they sell out for the money.

In order to take advantage of bribe money called grants, States have inserted themselves into California-style climate action plans to reduce arbitrary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). People can no longer say, “It’s just happening in California.”

Read the entire topic here: https://mailchi.mp/americanpolicy/urgent-article-by-dan-titus?e=4ef9d5f5a5

Didn't take long for Missouri to file their request for the bucks -

https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-02/missouri-plan-for-environmental-improvement-grants.pdf

Expand full comment

Bill 740 needs a write-up. Exactly what are the main points of the changes to current utility regulations? When I lived in Oregon Google hid its identity when building a data center. It also paid off the townships officials when it was disclosed exactly how much daily water use was needed to keep the computers cooled.

HB 1659 - what are the options the citizens have if this bill becomes law. Can we do anything about it?

HB2020 - how do we know that the allocation of these dollars is what citizens want? How do we know if the feds did not either put restrictions on what they surely knew would be excess funding, or designed how it was to be spent.

I find all of these bills unworthy.

Expand full comment