Does anyone know if bills 52/44 that establishes a reporting system: Develop, operate and maintain an information system for the collection, storage, maintenance, analysis and retrieval of crime incident and arrest reports from Missouri law enforcement agencies - in accordance with the standards and procedures of the national system, will occur under a federal grant program from the FBI or DOJ?
Curious as to who is paying for this and if the feds require it. Perhaps this will be one way for the FBI to gain data access on Missouri firearms.
• information pertaining to the immigration status – good
• In all cities of this state not within a county – is this just St Louis and Kansas City?
• endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree – bad
590.208 There is hereby established the "Committee on School Safety" within the department of public safety – what will this be over-riding or replacing? Surely each school district already has safety protocols. Is this new committee redundant or absolutely necessary? Allows for mission creep.
590.1500. Any officer of a law enforcement agency shall have the power to stop any person whenever there is reasonable ground to suspect that he or she is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and demand the person provide his or her name, address, business or activity, and where he or she is going. – What? I think not on the about to.
On SB 84, why do you oppose the bill in its entirety? I get that the words "or alarm" goes too far since it relies too heavily on what the election official is felling at the time. But there are good parts of this bill. I work to verify votes. We do this as prescribed by law. I would hate to think that someone or group could post all my personal information because a fair count of the vote showed them losing or their cause losing. I don't want to have my personal information including bank accounts or my address posted because a person or group got upset when they lost a vote. I think protecting election officials is important. Couldn't we strike
115.638 (2) strike "or deception against or" What does that mean? No clear definition.
strike all of (3) language too broad people can protest and no one should be intimidated. goes too far, IMO
and (4)-- strike "or alarm" too broad a definition
I'm sure I can find more but couldn't this get changed in mark-up and sent on. Why oppose the whole bill? With this logic of opposing bills in their entirety rather than marking them up and removing the egregious parts would make me oppose every bill proposed by anyone. How could we get any bill passed? I disagree with some word in damn near every MO statute and most of the words in the Mo Constitution. How would you protect election workers? Are you ok with posting all their personal info including banking routing numbers to the internet? Is it ok to post their addresses and phone numbers? Is it ok to say to their child, "you should tell your mom that Prop such and such should fail or she might regret it"? Tell me how you would fix it. When does that conversation ever happen on any bill? It's just yes or no and I think this all way more nuanced than that. I'll be working on trying to get it fixed not killed, Thanks for the heads up though.
If there is anything in a bill you do not like, reject the whole bill. Don't get pulled into the farce of rewriting their bad legislation.
Does anyone know if bills 52/44 that establishes a reporting system: Develop, operate and maintain an information system for the collection, storage, maintenance, analysis and retrieval of crime incident and arrest reports from Missouri law enforcement agencies - in accordance with the standards and procedures of the national system, will occur under a federal grant program from the FBI or DOJ?
Curious as to who is paying for this and if the feds require it. Perhaps this will be one way for the FBI to gain data access on Missouri firearms.
SB 52 & SB 44: PUBLIC SAFETY BILL
• information pertaining to the immigration status – good
• In all cities of this state not within a county – is this just St Louis and Kansas City?
• endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree – bad
590.208 There is hereby established the "Committee on School Safety" within the department of public safety – what will this be over-riding or replacing? Surely each school district already has safety protocols. Is this new committee redundant or absolutely necessary? Allows for mission creep.
590.1500. Any officer of a law enforcement agency shall have the power to stop any person whenever there is reasonable ground to suspect that he or she is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and demand the person provide his or her name, address, business or activity, and where he or she is going. – What? I think not on the about to.
On SB 84, why do you oppose the bill in its entirety? I get that the words "or alarm" goes too far since it relies too heavily on what the election official is felling at the time. But there are good parts of this bill. I work to verify votes. We do this as prescribed by law. I would hate to think that someone or group could post all my personal information because a fair count of the vote showed them losing or their cause losing. I don't want to have my personal information including bank accounts or my address posted because a person or group got upset when they lost a vote. I think protecting election officials is important. Couldn't we strike
115.638 (2) strike "or deception against or" What does that mean? No clear definition.
strike all of (3) language too broad people can protest and no one should be intimidated. goes too far, IMO
and (4)-- strike "or alarm" too broad a definition
I'm sure I can find more but couldn't this get changed in mark-up and sent on. Why oppose the whole bill? With this logic of opposing bills in their entirety rather than marking them up and removing the egregious parts would make me oppose every bill proposed by anyone. How could we get any bill passed? I disagree with some word in damn near every MO statute and most of the words in the Mo Constitution. How would you protect election workers? Are you ok with posting all their personal info including banking routing numbers to the internet? Is it ok to post their addresses and phone numbers? Is it ok to say to their child, "you should tell your mom that Prop such and such should fail or she might regret it"? Tell me how you would fix it. When does that conversation ever happen on any bill? It's just yes or no and I think this all way more nuanced than that. I'll be working on trying to get it fixed not killed, Thanks for the heads up though.