WATER EXPORTATION BILL AND THE BLOCKING OF THE PUBLIC ABILITY TO SUNSHINE WHO IS EXPORTING THE WATER FROM OUR STATE:
The “ WATER EXPORTATION BILLS” IN MISSOURI JUST HAD A HEARING THIS WEEK.
IF IT WAS REALLY ABOUT MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO EXPORT MISSOURI’S WATER THEN WHY DOES THE BILL NOT SIMPLY SAY THAT? BECAUSE THIS BILL IS ABOUT GIVING LICENSE TO CORPORATIONS WHO ARE ALREADY POTENTIALLY EXPORTING MISSOURI’S WATER NOW.
THINK AMERICAN WATER:
WHO IS THE LARGEST FARM LAND OWNER IN MISSOURI? BILL GATES
Did you know he is considered America’s largest “farmer”?
REMEMBER THIS AS YOU READ THIS ARTICLE. It will make sense as you see the push to truly export Missouri’s water and give LICENSE TO DO SO. READ IT AGAIN…RATHER THAN STOP THE EXPORTATION OF WATER IN MISSOURI, THIS BILL GIVES LICENSE TO DO SO. IT WILL ALSO GIVE CONTEXT AS TO WHY MIKE HENDERSON WILL TELL YOU HE IS SPONSORING A BILL TO “PROTECT” MISSOURI’S FARMERS FROM PEOPLE BEING ABLE TO SUNSHINE PUBLIC RECORDS ON WHO THEY GIVE PERMITS TO.
MIKE HENDERSON is pushing his bill to keep records on water permits issued from the DNR from being able to be sunshined in our state. WHY WOULD SENATOR MIKE HENDERSON ATTEMPT TO KEEP “MAJOR WATER USERS” (He will call them “farmers”) WHO HAVE BEEN GIVEN PERMITS (THINK BILL GATES) TO EXPORT HIS NEIGHBORS’ WATER? WHY KEEP THIS SO SECRETIVE? SO, when you have issues with your water table and want to know if and who has exportation permits to move Missouri’s water across state lines, you won’t know who to sue.
THINK CALIFORNIA AND THE RECENT WILD FIRES.
MICHIGAN ALLOWS PERMITS OF “MAJOR WATER USERS” TO EXPORT:
IF SENATOR MIKE HENDERSON AND REP. DANE DIEHL’S ALLOWANCE OF MAJOR WATER USERS TO BE HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC BILLS PASS…This is just another attempt at the Republican’s definition of “TORT REFORM”. YOU won’t be able to sue huge corporate interests such as American Water or Bill Gates and others because you won’t even know who they are. If the bill below becomes law, Missouri DNR will hide their identities from you…by law.
WHEN LOBBYISTS AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS USE THE TERM “FARMER” REMEMBER THIS MEANS BILL GATES, NOT WHO YOU THINK IT MEANS.
SENATOR BEAN AND BURGER: SPONSORING BILLS TO GIVE LICENSE TO MAJOR WATER USERS “FARMERS” LIKE BILL GATES, STEAL MISSOURI’S WATER FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPORTING OUR MOST PRECIOUS RESOURCE. THEY SAY THEIR BILLS PROTECT WATER FROM BEING EXPORTED. WHY DO THEIR BILLS NOT SAY THAT?
In listening to the bill sponsors lie in this week’s hearing about what their bills do was incredibly concerning as we watch California burn due to their lack of water rights there. Why are these men determined to allow corporate interests and big water users to steal Missouri’s water from the ordinary citizens and rewrite our riparian water rights in Missouri and EXPORT MISSOURI’S WATER FROM HER CITIZENS FOR A PRICE?
FIRST: The bill that was online for the public to see and review was subbed by these corrupt senators on the morning of the hearing. The public has NO idea what those changes are because their substitute bill was not available for the public to review. The testimony from lobbyists was clear that they had reviewed the sub. Why not make that available to the listening public prior to the hearing?
This is what the public is constantly dealing with in enduring the corruption of the senators who choose to deceive the public.
LET’S TAKE A LOOK AT SENATOR BEAN’S BILL:
BURGER’S BILL:
NOTE THE FIRST SENTENCE. WHY DID THEY NOT JUST STOP THERE?
BECAUSE…this bill is about giving license to large corporations to export Missouri’s water for the purpose of profit. They call that “beneficial use” in the bill. Who defines what is beneficial? Yes, beneficial to the profits of a large corporate water company, but not to the rights of everyday Missourians.
“PUBLIC” DOES NOT MEAN GOVERNMENT OWNED AND ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS BILL. It means a corporation that is a “for profit” private entity that is also considered a “PERSON” for the purpose of this bill. See that here:
WHO IS CONSIDERED A “PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY” IN THIS BILL? A SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION TO THE PUBLIC:
IT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE HEARING THAT WATER IS ALREADY BEING EXPORTED OUTSIDE OF OUR STATE TO DOWNSTREAM IN OKLAHOMA. IS THAT EVEN LEGAL? THIS BILL SHOULD MAKE THAT ILLEGAL RATHER THAN GIVE LICENSE TO THAT CONDUCT. MAKE ALL EXPORTATION FOR PROFIT ILLEGAL. THIS BILL GIVES PRIVATE COMPANIES LICENSE TO EXPORT THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE NOW.
THIS BILL WILL ALSO GIVE FULL LICENSE FOR THE DNR TO “LICENSE/PERMIT” OTHER “FOR PROFIT” PRIVATE CORPORATIONS “MAJOR WATER USERS” TO EXPORT WATER FROM MISSOURI THAT WILL LIKELY IMPACT THE WATER OF THEIR NEIGHBORS AT THE FULL DISCRETION OF THE MISSOURI DNR.
HERE IS THE PROBLEM: THIS BILL SPONSORED BY SENATOR MIKE HENDERSON KEEPS ANY “MAJOR WATER USER” HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC. IF YOUR WELL HAS RAN DRY OR YOU ARE HAVING A MAJOR ISSUE WITH YOUR WATER, YOU WILL NOT KNOW WHICH MAJOR WATER USERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN PERMITS IN YOUR AREA THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED “PERMITS” TO EXPORT WATER FROM MISSOURI BY THE DNR! READ THAT AGAIN.
TAKE A LOOK AT MIKE HENDERSON’S BILL:
SENATOR MIKE HENDERSON FILED THAT BILL.
HE WILL SAY HE DID IT TO PROTECT “FARMERS WITH MULTIPLE WELLS ON THEIR PROPERTY”. THAT WOULD BE A LIE. HOW MANY FARMERS ARE MAJOR WATER USERS WHO WANT TO EXPORT MISSOURI’S WATER TO ANOTHER STATE? MAYBE ZERO UNLESS YOUR NAME IS BILL GATES.
REMEMBER BILL GATES, HIS FOUNDATIONS AND HIS CORPORATIONS ARE CONSIDERED A “PERSON” UNDER THE BEAN/BURGER EXPORTATION BILLS. BILL GATES IS CONSIDERED A “FARMER” BASED ON THE DEFINITION OF A “FARMER.” IN FACT, HE IS THE LARGEST “FARMER” IN MISSOURI.
Soooo…if BILL GATES wants to export water from our state via a pipeline the DNR can give him a permit and you will never be able to verify he is potentially impacting your water quality or your riparian water rights if these bills both pass. THIS IS AN ULTIMATE BETRAYAL TO EVERY MISSOURIAN.
WANT TO GUESS WHERE GATES AG ONE IS HEADQUARTERED?
IN MISSOURI.
PRESIDING COMMISSIONER IKE SKELTON, A MEMBER OF THE MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, TESTIFIED THAT IN THEIR MEETING THEY VOTED TO OPPOSE THIS BILL FOR THE REASONS ADDRESSED ABOVE.
TEMPORARY CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE, SENATOR MIKE BERNSKOETTER, ABOUT FELL OUT OF HIS SEAT WHEN IKE SKELTON SAID THAT.
HE ASKED WHERE COMMISSIONER SKELTON’S LOBBYIST WAS.
Doesn’t that say it all? Rather than listening to the testimony of the a presiding commissioner, he wanted to hear from the lobbyist. THE LOBBYIST WAS NOT THERE TO TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF HIS ORGANIZATION. HE WAS TOO MUCH OF A COWARD TO TESTIFY HOW THE MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES VOTED TO HAVE HIM REPRESENT THEM. HE SIMPLY DID NOT TESTIFY AT ALL RATHER THAN TRULY REPRESENT HIS OWN ORGANIZATION. THIS IS WHAT LOBBYISTS DO.
LISTEN TO PRESIDING COMMISSIONER OF CAMDEN COUNTY, IKE SKELTON, GIVE HIS TESTIMONY AGAINST THE EXPORTATION OF MISSOURI’S WATER BILL HERE:
CINDY O’LAUGHLIN GRAIN BELT:
This article explains what the Grain Belt is and what it will do to the farmers in Missouri with eminent domain…the taking of their land for the benefit of a private, for profit, corporation. THIS ARTICLE SHOWS HOW DUPLICITOUS CINDY O’LAUGHLIN HAS BEEN ON THIS ISSUE IN HER BETRAYAL OF HER OWN CONSTITUENTS IN FAVOR OF HER PERSONAL INTERESTS:
MORE ON O’LAUGHLIN AND HER BETRAYAL OF HER OWN CONSTITUENTS:
Click any photo to read entire article:
IS THIS WHY CINDY O’LAUGHLIN RAN TO BE SENATOR? TO PROFIT HER OWN FAMILY WOULD APPEAR TO BE HER MOTIVATION (NOTE THE DATE):
BILLS HEARD IN COMMITTEE REFERENCED IN PODCAST:
MELANIE STINETT: HB 804/INSURANCE
SB 84: REPUBLICAN SENATOR JAMIE BURGER/ELECTIONS
COPY OF RADICAL DEMOCRAT SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND SENATOR DICK DURBIN’S ELECTION BILL AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL (SEE BELOW)
WHY DO MISSOURI REPUBLICAN’S PUSH THE RADICAL DEMOCRAT AGENDA AT THE STATE LEVEL? THIS IS PROOF THAT THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE RADICAL LEFTIST PLAYBOOK BY BRINGING THEIR LEGISLATION TO MISSOURI. THIS. NEEDS. TO. STOP.
SENATOR RICK BRATTIN/SB 22/ BALLOT LANGUAGE
SB 33/DEMOCRAT SENATOR BECK/ALLOWS FOR INCREASE TAX FOR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS:
SENATOR MIKE CIERPIOT: SB 4 and SB 5/ELECTRICITY INCREASES
SB 5: CIERPIOT ELECTRICITY INCREASE BILL
WITNESS TESTIMONY FOR AND AGAINST:
SENATOR CIERPIOT SB 6/ CLOSURE OF COAL PLANTS
DID YOU SEE THAT? AMY BLUNT IS LOBBYING ON BEHALF OF FACEBOOK/META ON A PUBLIC UTILITY BILL
SB 29: SENATOR BEAN/LICENSE TO EXPORT MISSOURI WATER BY SECRETIVE PERMIT PROCESS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC IF SENATOR MIKE HENDERSON’S BILL SB 157 BECOMES THE LAW/LICENSE TO EXPORT WITHOUT PERMISSION TO PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES (EXAMPLE: MISSOURI AMERICAN WATER)
MAKE SURE TO NOTE: MO CORN GROWERS, MO SOYBEAN, MO CATTLEMEN, AND MO FARM BUREAU ARE NOT LOBBYING FOR SMALL FARMERS…LOBBYING FOR BIG, BIG “FARMERS”. THIS WILL BE A CONSISTENT THEME ONCE YOU START PAYING ATTENTION.
SB 43/SENATOR FITZWATER/CHILD RESIDENTIAL HOUSING/DANGEROUS TO PARENTAL RIGHTS
SB 72/ SENATOR DAVID GREGORY/ILLEGAL ALIEN BOUNTY HUNTER BILL
HB 711/REPRESENTATIVE BRAD POLLITT/ OPEN ENROLLMENT BILL
A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OPPOSITION FROM ORDINARY CITIZENS WHO TESTIFIED:
SB 14/SENATOR JUSTIN BROWN/”TORT REFORM” TO PROTECT LARGE COMPANIES FROM POSTING WARNING LABLES ON CHEMICALS USED ON FOOD OR OTHER POTENTIAL CONSUMABLE FOOD OR DRINKING WATER.
LOOK….”FARMER BILL GATES” AGAIN
THEY WANT TO KEEP WARNING LABLES LOOSE AND NOT BE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD.
WHY?
MAYBE FOR THIS REASON:
AND THIS:
LOOK WHO SUPPORTS THIS BILL IN FAVOR OF BIG AG…REMEMBER THE START OF THIS POST? THE LOBBYISTS WHO ARE TESTIFYING “FOR FARMERS” ARE TESTIFYING FOR THE BILL GATES-TYPE OF “FARMER”…MISSOURI’S BIGGEST “FARMER”.
DID YOU SEE THAT?
KATHERINE HANAWAY FOR “HUSCH BLACKWELL” IS LOBBYING FOR BILL GATES. HUSCH BLACKWELL = THE BLUNT FAMILY LOBBYING CARTEL IN MISSOURI.
LOOK: MO CATTLEMEN, MO SOYBEAN ASSN., MO CORN GROWERS, MO PORK, BAYER/MONSANTO, MO FARM BUREAU ALL FOR THE PROTECTION OF BIG AG TO THE DETRIMENT OF ORDINARY MISSOURIANS AND “SMALL FARMERS”. WHO ARE THEY REALLY LOBBYING FOR?
PAUSE: LET US LOOK AT AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THESE BIG AG LOBBYISTS ARE PROMOTING BIG AG TO THE FULL DETRIMENT OF SMALL FARMERS IN MO.
Look at a bill that was sponsored a couple of years ago that would have allowed Missourians to buy raw milk at their own risk. BELOW IS A BILL THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED THE REGULATED DAIRY INDUSTRY IN MISSOURI TO ALLOW SMALL FARMERS WHO WANT TO SELL THEIR MILK, WITH A LABEL DISCLOSING THAT CONSUMERS SHOULD USE AT THEIR OWN RISK. WHY DID THE MO CATTLEMEN, MO FARM BUREAU, AND MO SOYBEAN ASSN. OPPOSE BILLS THAT WOULD HELP SMALL FARMERS?
This act is substantially similar to SB 235 (2021), SB 861 (2020), and HB 1335 (2020).
WANT TO GUESS WHO OPPOSED LABELED RAW MILK FROM BEING SOLD BY MISSOURI’S SMALL FARMERS:
YOU GUESSED IT: MO FARM BUREAU, MO SOYBEAN, AND MO CATTLEMEN ASSN.
THE SAME LOBBYISTS WHO TESTIFY REGULARLY ON BEHALF OF “FARMERS” ARE NOT TESTIFYING FOR SMALL MISSOURI “FARMERS” LIKE THE SMALL DAIRY FARMERS WHO ARE HEAVILY REGULATED BY THE STATE ALREADY WHO SIMPLY WANT THE ABILITY TO SELL RAW MILK.
MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF “FARMER” THEY MEAN. IT CERTAINLY IS NOT THE LITTLE GUY THEY ARE LOBBYING FOR IN JEFFERSON CITY REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU ARE TOLD. LET THIS ONE SMALL EXAMPLE PERFECTLY ILLUSTRATE THIS. THERE WILL BE MANY MORE. STAY TUNED. WE WILL KEEP YOU INFORMED AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATE WHAT GOES ON IN JC WHEN YOU ARE HOME IN THE FIELDS AND YOUR BARNS. MISSOURI’S SMALL FARMERS ARE BEING SOLD OUT DUE TO THE BIG AG LOBBYISTS EVERY DAY.
BELOW IS THE RAW MILK BILL SPONSORED IN 2023.
Share this post